Stream: implementers
Topic: queries we SHALL support
Lital Inghel (Mar 10 2022 at 06:54):
in this page it says we SHALL support
id
specialty
practitioner
http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/STU3.1.1/CapabilityStatement-us-core-server.html#practitionerrole
but here in the bottom it talks about SHALL support chained parameters-practitioner name and identifier http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/STU3.1.1/StructureDefinition-us-core-practitionerrole.html
I usually look at the http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/STU3.1.1/CapabilityStatement-us-core-server.html#practitionerrole
to understand what we shall support, is there misalignment here?
Gino Canessa (Mar 10 2022 at 16:05):
I do not believe there is a way to describe chained-parameter support in CapabilityStatement today (please someone jump in if I am wrong).
Assuming that is still true, while the CapabilityStatement narrative could include text about it, that would be incorrect since it is defined as a "...summary of the resource...".
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 10 2022 at 17:30):
We had talked about a syntax for distinguishing between ".*' chaining vs. enumerated chaining. Don't remember where it landed though.
Lital Inghel (Mar 10 2022 at 18:59):
so I'm not sure,
it says:
SHALL support searching practitioner role by practitioner name and identifier using chained parameters using the practitioner search parameter:
including support for these chained parameters: practitioner.identifier,practitioner.name
so it is not supporting a query by the practitioner reference, but a different query using the practitioner.identifier and practitioner.name?
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 10 2022 at 20:01):
@Eric Haas @Brett Marquard
Brett Marquard (Mar 14 2022 at 16:34):
I mean, I would expect systems that support practitioner.identifier and practitioner.name would have built in support for query by reference....maybe not. If this is a problem, log a tracker for us to consider
Lital Inghel (Mar 14 2022 at 16:34):
hey, regarding my Q:
it says:
image.png
so it is not supporting a query by the practitioner reference, but a different query using the practitioner.identifier and practitioner.name?
Lital Inghel (Mar 14 2022 at 16:36):
Brett Marquard said:
I mean, I would expect systems that support practitioner.identifier and practitioner.name would have built in support for query by reference....maybe not. If this is a problem, log a tracker for us to consider
we do support query by reference but it is not by using the chained parameters described, it is by using practitioner id
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
