Stream: implementers
Topic: optional datatype validation
Kirstine Rosenbeck Gøeg (Sep 18 2020 at 11:53):
I have gotten reports that validation fails, if an attribute with an optional datatype e.g. value[x] is only constrained on datatype. Which would mean that an Observation.value[x] constrained to string, without any other profiling done to the value[x] field, will not validate. Differential looks like this:
,
{
"id" : "Observation.value[x]",
"path" : "Observation.value[x]",
"type" : [
{
"code" : "string"
}
]
},
Has anyone else experienced this? If yes, why is it that it doesn't validate?
Grahame Grieve (Sep 18 2020 at 11:56):
can you provide a full profile and an instance? I'm not quite sure what you mean
Kirstine Rosenbeck Gøeg (Sep 18 2020 at 12:06):
I have both a profile and an example on this one: http://build.fhir.org/ig/Kirstinerosenbeck/FKInfo/branches/master/StructureDefinition-KLCommonCareSocialInformation.html
(I know the profile has a stupid name, because everything is "information", and that the IG has a silly path - it is a work i progress)
Grahame Grieve (Sep 22 2020 at 11:19):
so I validated this resource against the profile http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/StructureDefinition/KLCommonCareSocialInformation using the package from that branch:
{
"resourceType" : "Observation",
"id" : "MobilityInformation",
"meta" : {
"profile" : [
"http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/StructureDefinition/KLCommonCareSocialInformation"
]
},
"status" : "final",
"code" : {
"coding" : [
{
"system" : "urn:oid:1.2.208.176.2.21",
"code" : "J3",
"display" : "Mobilitet"
}
]
},
"subject" : {
"reference" : "Patient/Judith"
},
"effectiveDateTime" : "2020-08-11T15:28:17-01:00",
"valueString" : "Judith har faldtendens, men er meget dedikeret ift. at lære at bruge sin rollator indendørs og udendørs, og desuden går hun en tur på 30min hver dag"
}
Grahame Grieve (Sep 22 2020 at 11:19):
I got this output:
Grahame Grieve (Sep 22 2020 at 11:19):
|FHIR Validation tool Version 5.1.11-SNAPSHOT (Git# 8a11bd2e9b6f). Built 2020-09-16T06:48:26.711+10:00 (6 days old)
Java: 1.8.0_251 from C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_251 on amd64 (64bit). 14526MB available
Paths: Current = c:\temp, Package Cache = C:\Users\graha\.fhir\packages
Params: C:\temp\mobility.json -ig C:\temp\package-dk.tgz -profile http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/StructureDefinition/KLCommonCareSocialInformation
Scanning for versions (no -version parameter):
Package C:\temp\package-dk.tgz: 4.0
-> use version 4.0
Loading
Load FHIR v4.0 from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1 - 4575 resources (00:03.0826)
Terminology server http://tx.fhir.org - Version 1.0.349 (00:02.0927)
Load C:\temp\package-dk.tgz+ .. load IG from hl7.fhir.us.core#3.1.0 - 228 resources (00:00.0922)
Get set... go (00:00.0002)
Validating
Profiles: [http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/StructureDefinition/KLCommonCareSocialInformation]
Validate C:\temp\mobility.json 00:00.0116
Done. Times: Loading: 00:08.0168, validation: 00:00.0116
*FAILURE*: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1 notes
Error @ Observation.code (line 11, col17) : None of the codes provided are in the value set http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/ValueSet/KLInformationCodes (http://kl.dk/fhir/common/caresocial/ValueSet/KLInformationCodes), and a code from this value set is required) (codes = urn:oid:1.2.208.176.2.21#J3)
Information @ Observation.code.coding[0] (line 12, col8) : Code System URI 'urn:oid:1.2.208.176.2.21' is unknown so the code cannot be validated
Kirstine Rosenbeck Gøeg (Sep 23 2020 at 08:00):
Thanks. That is an expected error - sorry I didn't catch that before I decided this was a great example. No errors regarding the validation of valueString so that is great. Wonder if @Signe Hejgaard Kristoffersen could remember more details about what it is that won't validate in their system?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
