Stream: implementers
Topic: operation.defintion.name in CapabilityStatement
Yunwei Wang (Mar 23 2022 at 15:03):
The CS says that "The name here SHOULD be the same as the name in the definition, unless there is a name clash and the name cannot be used. The name does not include the "$" portion that is always included in the URL." http://build.fhir.org/capabilitystatement-definitions.html#CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.operation.name
Should that be "... same as the code in the definition"? What follows $ is the OperationDefinition.code
Yunwei Wang (Mar 23 2022 at 15:13):
I found the confusing related to the confusing use of the word "name" in OperationDefinition.
OperationDefinition.name is "Name for this operation definition (computer friendly)" and
OperationDefinition.code is "Name used to invoke the operation"
So when CS says "the name in the definition", what name it refers to?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
