FHIR Chat · more bidirectional references · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: more bidirectional references


view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Feb 21 2017 at 21:14):

http://build.fhir.org/valueset-link-type.html defines replaced-by *and* replaces. Is it expected that a pair of patients (one active, one not) would link bidirectinoally back and forth using these link types in Patient.link.other?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 24 2017 at 18:59):

I think it's expected that they could. but not would.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 24 2017 at 19:00):

but I think they should


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC