FHIR Chat · ips ballot september · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: ips ballot september

view this post on Zulip Joel Francis (Jun 07 2019 at 21:11):

Hi @Rob Hausam ,

Will the september 2019 balloted version of IPS contain content aligned with US-Core R4?

Thanks,

Joel

view this post on Zulip Joel Francis (Jun 10 2019 at 12:13):

Hi Rob Hausam ,

Will the september 2019 balloted version of IPS contain content aligned with US-Core R4?

Thanks,

Joel

@Giorgio Cangioli , can you please help answer?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 10 2019 at 12:14):

I believe that the answer is yes

view this post on Zulip Joel Francis (Jun 10 2019 at 12:42):

Hi Rob Hausam ,

Will the september 2019 balloted version of IPS contain content aligned with US-Core R4?

Thanks,

Joel

Giorgio Cangioli , can you please help answer?

Thanks @Grahame Grieve

view this post on Zulip Giorgio Cangioli (Jun 11 2019 at 10:07):

Hi Joel,
yes one of the intent of this version is to facilitate the harmonization between Argonaut/US Core and IPS, considering however that they have slightly different scopes. This version hopes also to provide a better support for the local adoption of the IPS (i.e. not only for cross-border)

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Jun 11 2019 at 15:48):

Apologies for the slow reply, @Joel Francis Yes, as Grahame and Giorgio said. Alignment with Argonaut is a primary reason for going to ballot again in September - and our intent is to align as closely as possible (especially structurally) while remaining international in the IPS spec.

view this post on Zulip Joel Francis (Jun 12 2019 at 14:00):

Apologies for the slow reply, Joel Francis Yes, as Grahame and Giorgio said. Alignment with Argonaut is a primary reason for going to ballot again in September - and our intent is to align as closely as possible (especially structurally) while remaining international in the IPS spec.

Thank you @Rob Hausam and @Giorgio Cangioli

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC


An HL7 Website -