Stream: implementers
Topic: intermediary in Communication
Eric Haas (Jul 27 2017 at 23:10):
I am trying to map an intermediary organization in Communication. I see that receiver max is * . I am considering an extension indiicate an intermediate receiver who distributes an electronic document to the ultimate recipient. E.g, State Public Health Agency X receives a case report and forwards to the appropriate county Public Health Agency Z. ... or... is this more of a Provenance thing?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 28 2017 at 05:46):
Indirect delivery is more of a messaging thing. Communication should be about end recipients, not routing. Routing would be the responsibility of the transport layer.
Eric Haas (Jul 28 2017 at 07:50):
Public health Case reports pass through more than one organization and jurisdictional authority and there is a need to track that
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 28 2017 at 08:26):
But wouldn't that tracking be with AuditEvent or Provenance?
John Moehrke (Jul 28 2017 at 12:52):
Tracking the pathway as it happens would be AuditEvent or Provenance. But Eric, are you looking for a way to specify that pathway (routing list) prior to starting down the path?
Eric Haas (Jul 29 2017 at 01:11):
That is my question. is the intermediary ( e.g., a state PHA that looks at case report then forwards it to county PHA ) represented in Communication.reciever or as a Provenance or AuditEvent.)
Eric Haas (Jul 29 2017 at 01:12):
For more context:
Eric Haas (Jul 29 2017 at 01:13):
Case Report originates from provider A ---> jurisdiction B ----> jurisdiction C
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
