Stream: implementers
Topic: instantiates to PlanDefinition.action
Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 24 2020 at 06:48):
I believe it's legitimate for instantiatesCanonical on a resource (e.g. Procedure, Observation, whatever) to not only point to the canonical URL of the PlanDefinition for the protocol the event is happening because of, but also to include the id of the specific activity within the PlanDefinition. E.g. http://someserver.com/fhir/PlanDefinition/foo#someactivityid
- is this in fact legitimate, or can we make it legitimate?
- if it is legitimate, what do you get back with the FHIRPath of SomeProcedure.instantiatesCanonical.resolve()?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 24 2020 at 06:48):
@Grahame Grieve @Bryn Rhodes
Grahame Grieve (Jun 24 2020 at 07:20):
no it's not legitimate. you need to use the target extension
Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 24 2020 at 14:00):
Where is that extension defined?
Grahame Grieve (Jun 24 2020 at 20:25):
it appears that it isn't.
Grahame Grieve (Jun 24 2020 at 20:36):
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
