Stream: implementers
Topic: immunization-status-reason
Lital Inghel (Feb 09 2022 at 15:19):
can we use for statusReason the code 310376006? is it an "allowed" value based on the IG?
image.png
http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/valueset-immunization-status-reason.html
Josh Mandel (Feb 09 2022 at 15:21):
You're asking whether 310376006 concept "is-a" itself? Yes. (At least... that seems logical to me, but if there's some special handling here I'm unfamiliar.)
Josh Mandel (Feb 09 2022 at 15:22):
But I see it's missing from the expansion. @Grahame Grieve ?
Grahame Grieve (Feb 09 2022 at 20:07):
well, I don't know either. It shouldn't be. But note that bindings is an example binding
Josh Mandel (Feb 09 2022 at 20:37):
Wait you are saying that "X is-a X" should be false in SNOMED? (The behavior here matters irrespective of whether this is an example or a required binding...)
Josh Mandel (Feb 09 2022 at 20:37):
Oh, you're saying it should not be missing from the expansion, and "X is-a X"' should be true! That makes sense.
Josh Mandel (Feb 09 2022 at 20:38):
Seems like a bug in the value set expansion algorithm then. Is there somewhere I should report that to?
Grahame Grieve (Feb 09 2022 at 21:45):
a jira issue would be good
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
