FHIR Chat · eld-6 eld-7 · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: eld-6 eld-7

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:24):

I think eld-6 and eld-7 on elementdefinition make legal differentials fail validation. It's not necessary to re-state (in the differential) the type just to use fixed or pattern. Yes?

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:26):

This is a legal differential.element I think:

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:26):

<element id="email.system">
    <path value="Patient.telecom.system" />
    <name value="email.system" />
    <min value="1" />
   <fixedCode value="email" />
</element>

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:26):

(with or without the id and name)

Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 18:39):

yes, they should check whether a type is specified or not

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:42):

GF#10034

Chris Grenz (May 16 2016 at 18:42):

@Josh Mandel is the coolest with that auto-link thing.

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC