Stream: implementers
Topic: adaption of RFC 7807
Jens Villadsen (May 27 2020 at 12:42):
Has anyone been looking into RFC 7807 as an alternative way of representing errors / operation outcomes?
Lloyd McKenzie (May 27 2020 at 14:06):
The biggest issue I see with it is that the RFC only allows passing back a single issue - and we need to pass back multiple problems.
Jens Villadsen (May 28 2020 at 09:39):
couldn't that be handled with https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7807#section-3.2 ?
Lloyd McKenzie (May 28 2020 at 14:10):
Essentially all of the data we have would end up going into that 'extension' area - and we'd have nothing useful to put in the root - because we have no notion of a 'primary' issue. All we have is an un-ordered collection.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
