Stream: implementers
Topic: XHTML options in extraDetails string
Tristan Wilson (Aug 09 2018 at 16:17):
We're looking to store HTML in our HealthcareService.extraDetails element. It is of type string. Is this appropriate, or should we create an extension to format similar data to extraDetails in an HTML format?
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 09 2018 at 16:21):
It be escaped if sent in the XML. You might consider using the markdown type.
Tim Berezny (Aug 09 2018 at 17:07):
Markdown would be good, are you suggesting putting markdown into the string (HealthcareService.extraDetails element), or creating an extension of datatype markdown?
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 09 2018 at 17:09):
Ideally, get extraDetails to change to be markdown. You've got 1.5 days to get that pre-adopted before ballot lockdown. :) @Brian Postlethwaite ?
Tim Berezny (Aug 09 2018 at 17:38):
Heh, alrighty.
Added here:
https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=17648
Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 02:21):
I think for PA we've passed the point where we have capacity to include more stuff.
There is a standard extension that you could use to include the markdown variant of the field that you could use to satisfy both.
http://build.fhir.org/extension-rendering-markdown.html
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
