Stream: implementers
Topic: Valueset for Patient.contact.relationship
Yunwei Wang (Jul 19 2016 at 12:31):
Just noticed that the valueset for Patient.contact.relationship is different between DSTU2 and STU3. The valueset in DSTU2 is http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-patient-contact-relationship.html. The valueset in STU3 is a V2 table http://hl7-fhir.github.io/v2/0131/index.html. Is this correct?
Grahame Grieve (Jul 19 2016 at 12:58):
it's deliberate
Yunwei Wang (Jul 19 2016 at 13:09):
OK. So if I want to say "Parent/Guardian", then I need to add my own value to the value set.
Brian Postlethwaite (Jul 19 2016 at 13:42):
I'd recommend reading the section in the spec on patient contact vs related person http://hl7-fhir.github.io/patient.html#contact to ensure that you're really wanting to put data in the patient.contact.
This is usually used for critical contact details that persist over time, all other uses are typically RelatedPerson where the full relationship is, and can be used when referencing from other resources such as careplans, observations etc.
Yunwei Wang (Jul 19 2016 at 13:44):
@Brian Postlethwaite Thank you. You are right. I missed the different between these two. What I really need is related person.
Brian Postlethwaite (Jul 19 2016 at 13:45):
The entry in the contacts on the patient record needs relationship details. For the parent, probably would have 2 entries from the list bound, "n" and "c", and maybe "bp"
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
