FHIR Chat · Test.fhir.org unsecured, broken link · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Test.fhir.org unsecured, broken link


view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Dec 06 2021 at 19:29):

@Grahame Grieve when I try https://test.fhir.org/r4/Observation I get

image.png

but the "unsecured" link is to http://https//test.fhir.org/r4. When I fix this by turning it into https://test.fhir.rog/r4 I wind up basically back where I started.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 07 2021 at 05:09):

thanks. fixed next upgrade (which just got closer)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 07 2021 at 05:09):

should be http://test.fhir.org/r4

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Dec 07 2021 at 14:05):

Thanks. Ah, there's no way to connect that is https but open?

view this post on Zulip René Spronk (Dec 07 2021 at 14:44):

Similarly I had https:/[testserver]/metadata fail on me the other day because of an auth failure. Do we have any wording about potential security issues around exposing /metadata ?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 07 2021 at 18:06):

there's no way to connect that is https but open

No. It's on my todo list, but it's not possible right now

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 07 2021 at 18:07):

Do we have any wording about potential security issues around exposing /metadata ?

I don't think so. Servers may choose to require auth to see their capability statement, or they may choose to serve a different one to an authorised user

view this post on Zulip René Spronk (Dec 08 2021 at 07:16):

You seem to suggest that having a 'public' minimal version may be a way to go forward? Akin to the /.well-known file for oAuth, one needs to have certain minimal information to go on..


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC