Stream: implementers
Topic: Support for Condition in Claim
Peter Bernhardt (May 04 2016 at 18:51):
In reviewing the STU3 version of Claim, I find there is no place to reference a related condition resource. Has this received any discussion in the WG?
Eric Haas (May 06 2016 at 05:36):
Peter you can browse
Eric Haas (May 06 2016 at 05:36):
Gforge for (open or closed) tracker or create one. I don't recall any discussions on this when I've been on the call
Michelle (Moseman) Miller (May 06 2016 at 13:39):
I would question whether we have the richness of a Condition (resource) conveyed in a claim context or workflow? For example, condition requires verification status, but I don't typically see that in the claim itself. Claim specifications I've seen (US-based) typically have limited information beyond the basic diagnosis code and sequence/ranking.
Lloyd McKenzie (May 06 2016 at 17:17):
My guess is that this would be a "CodeableConcept|Reference(Condition)" situation (and it may be that the Reference falls outside the 80%)
Paul Knapp (May 07 2016 at 12:07):
@Peter: We have and Michelle is correct for the US and elsewhere as well. Would you like to discuss at FM on Wednesday?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC