Stream: implementers
Topic: Status of PractitionerRole in STU3
Dave Carlson (Feb 08 2017 at 23:01):
What is the status of accepting PractitionerRole in STU3, vs role backbone element within Practitioner? There is a note in PratitionerRole stating that the role element within Practitioner will be removed if PractitionerRole is accepted. I am working on design for an application and the development team focused only on Practitioner resource to define roles. Need clarification on best path foward using STU3 when published.
Grahame Grieve (Feb 09 2017 at 03:53):
@Brian Postlethwaite @Cooper Thompson @Line Saele
Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 09 2017 at 04:50):
This has been approved by the workgroup (at the WGM), and FMG last week.
I'm yet to apply the change, but will do so this weekend.
Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 09 2017 at 04:51):
Then see the full impact on samples and other IGs
Dave Carlson (Feb 09 2017 at 15:36):
Thanks @Brian Postlethwaite, so as part of this update will the role backbone element within Pratitioner be removed for STU-3? I assume that's what you mean by "full impact on samples", just want to confirm so that I can communicate this expectation to our development team.
Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 09 2017 at 23:37):
Yes, this is correct.
Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 14 2017 at 12:58):
This change has now been committed, I also udpated all the examples!
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
