FHIR Chat · Seriousness Valueset · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Seriousness Valueset


view this post on Zulip Michael Hosking (Feb 25 2021 at 18:43):

Currently looking to codify seriousness values using SNOMED CT. The current FHIR valueset includes:
https://www.hl7.org/fhir/valueset-adverse-event-seriousness.html

Has anyone looked to codify these using SNOMED CT?

view this post on Zulip Peter Jordan (Feb 25 2021 at 19:24):

Hi Michael, I think that anyone will struggle to provide a coherent Value Set for this in SNOMED CT - certainly without using post-coordinated concepts. |42745003 Serious| is a quantifier - but, in reality, just an adjective and the ontology doesn't attempt to classify degrees of seriousness. I am assuming that you are interested in adverse events, rather than adverse reactions - but I know that you're involved in the NZ COVID-19 vaccination project where adverse reactions will be an important consideration.

view this post on Zulip Michael Hosking (Feb 26 2021 at 05:29):

Thanks Peter,
Yes, that's right I'm looking at adverse events, not adverse reactions. I'm trying to avoid post-coordination where possible to limit potential issues surrounding the data model.
If it doesn't exist, I might avoid trying to force 'near enough' codes and use the FHIR valueset that exists.
Thanks again


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC