FHIR Chat · Section identifiers · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Section identifiers


view this post on Zulip Stephen Royce (Sep 09 2016 at 02:53):

Currently Composition.section contains no element(s) for (business) identifers of the section. In general, I don't think this is a problem, but I was just wondering if sections ever need to be identified so that it's possible to determine that two sections are in fact the same, e.g. this medication list and that medication list are the same list? If so, an extension is not likely to suffice because it will only work in limited circumstances.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Sep 09 2016 at 03:59):

if 2 sections had the same identifier, would you say that there sub-section lists must be the same?

view this post on Zulip Stephen Royce (Sep 09 2016 at 07:18):

Yes, I suppose so, because the section would need to be identical in it's entirety to be identified as the same section. Anyway, I'm just wondering if there's a use case for being able to identify the same list of things across different compositions. I really have no idea if that's useful or not. We're certainly happy to drop section identifiers from our models; they're a pain!

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Sep 09 2016 at 07:21):

maybe maybe not. I'm interested in comments from other peiple


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC