FHIR Chat · SDC questionnaire vs Resource · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: SDC questionnaire vs Resource


view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 11 2016 at 06:36):

based on the Birth Notice conversation and this comment...

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 11 2016 at 06:38):

"..Using Questionnaire as a means of primary data exchange means you're using FHIR as a transport for custom data structures" from this stream https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/implementers/subject/Birth.20notice

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 11 2016 at 06:39):

Isn't that what SDC is, in essence, doing? Or am I missing something?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 11 2016 at 15:42):

With SDC, questionnaires are still intended for a specific consumer - a specific clinical study, a specific governmental organization, a specific payor. They don't provide any general level of interoperability. SDC does add some extensions to make it easier to populate data into questionnaires. In principle, I suppose it could also make it easier to extract that data, but it'd be clunky. You'd still have trouble discovering the right questionnaire responses and you'd be reliant on systems making use of extensions as it's not a "standard" (read 'common') set of behavior for systems that support questionnaires.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC