Stream: implementers
Topic: Resource comparisons
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 00:49):
Suppose you have two FHIR responses, of say allergies, and you wish to compare them to see the differences. Does anyone know if any open-source tools which may help?
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 00:50):
I usually save them to json or xml using pretty print, and then use a text editor to compare them
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 00:50):
For example I want to know if an allergy in resource 1 exists in resource 2, even if it is coded differently?
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 00:50):
but there are specific xml compar tools
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 00:50):
phoooar - I've never heard of anything like that
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 00:51):
I thought that might be the case!
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 00:53):
If the codings were the same then a simple comparison should be possible, as you say by json/xml
Peter Bernhardt (May 16 2016 at 16:32):
@Mark Gill this is a data curation problem more than anything, isn't it? REST and HTTP (think last modified and ETag headers) will take you pretty far if you have a pure FHIR interface (but who has that in a real-world production system?). I've found the bigger challenge is when you have a system that aggregates data from heterogenous data sources (e.g., v2 or CDA).
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 21:00):
Thanks @Peter Bernhardt. I'm looking at comparing data from two different sources and seeing what from set A is/isn't in set B.
I was hoping there would be some coding system mapper I could use but (say pass in a coding from system A and the system from system B then output an equivalent coding from system B) to no avail so far!
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 21:11):
there isn't yet, but some of us are working on it for later this year. what terminologies are you interested in?
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 22:23):
I'm interested in the systems DOCLE, BP-shared and SNOMED-CT and domains allergies, conditions and medication orders
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 22:51):
Australian then. Well, there's some very minor prospect of these terminologies being mapped sufficiently sometime in the next couple of years
Mark Gill (May 16 2016 at 22:56):
OK, thanks @Grahame Grieve
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC