Stream: implementers
Topic: Refining Touchstone TestScripts
Abbie Watson (Mar 23 2017 at 16:34):
Is there a particular forum or recommended process for commenting and improving Touchstone tests?
I've been going through one of the Touchstone test scripts /FHIR1-6-0-Basic/P-R/Practitioner/Client Assigned Id/Practitioner-client-id-json, and it expects a 200 code(OK) code for a query for a _history; but the spec states that a 404(NotFound) should be sent if the server doesn't support versioning. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/http.html#versioning
I'm fine with implementing versioning over the long run; but it may be 6 or 12 months yet before we get it all in place. In the meantime, I'd like to get the test to have a Warning for a missing 200(OK) code instead of an Error. Shouldn't there be a testing or touchstone channel?
Richard Ettema (Mar 24 2017 at 12:29):
@Abigail Watson I have copied your question over to the new Touchstone stream.
nicola (RIO/SS) (Mar 24 2017 at 14:31):
Touchstone (@Mario Hyland ) are you going to serve your TestScript resources by FHIR REST API?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
