FHIR Chat · Reference to Person · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Reference to Person


view this post on Zulip Stefan Lang (Aug 30 2018 at 07:00):

In the resolution GF#17760 @Lloyd McKenzie states that a Person is never an actor, which of course is in sync with the definition of Person.
But Contract allows references to Person in multiple elements. So is this a valid exemption and if yes: why? Or is this a misconception in Contract?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 30 2018 at 07:10):

That's a prohibited use. Thanks for flagging it. I've raised GF#17770. @Paul Knapp - for your attention.

view this post on Zulip Stefan Lang (Aug 30 2018 at 07:12):

thanks

view this post on Zulip Paul Knapp (Aug 31 2018 at 15:19):

Yes will remove, thanks.

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Sep 01 2018 at 06:13):

I thought we had a build error hooked to that one.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 01 2018 at 19:39):

Apparently not. Feel free to submit a change request :)

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 01 2018 at 19:40):

Invariant on Reference?

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Sep 04 2018 at 03:12):

Nope, I'd suggest hard error validating the core build. Not an invariant for examples.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC