Stream: implementers
Topic: Questionnaire Maturity
Ed Costello (Jul 17 2016 at 20:41):
Hey, I've noticed that Maturity Level of Questionnaire in the STU-3 dev build has dropped to 0 ( http://hl7-fhir.github.io/questionnaire.html ) it was previously 2 in the DSTU-2 release.
Is this just an error or is it related to the introduction of enabled, initial etc indicating that it's less mature than thought?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 18 2016 at 03:31):
There was a bug in the generator that was asserting that warnings existed even though none were reported. It will likely be level 3 before publication.
Ed Costello (Jul 19 2016 at 03:14):
Thanks for that. Related, is there more detail somewhere about the use cases enableWhen is targeted at solving (beyond what's written in the spec). Unless I'm miss-reading it seems to only support a equality match. So while it makes sense for boolean, coding, maybe string, the full range of types in the answer seems odd (i.e. exact match on an attachment, url or decimal rather than just a hasAnswer)
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 19 2016 at 13:42):
It can also enable/disable if a question is answered or not. I can't imagine enabling/disabling a question or section based on what url is typed or attachment is selected. If you want to start to get into math, then you're looking at using an extension that uses CQL or FluentPath to do your determinations
Brian Postlethwaite (Jul 19 2016 at 13:50):
I could imagine that you might have an enable-when field to capture a title or description if an attachment is included, not on what the attachment is.
Brian Postlethwaite (Jul 19 2016 at 13:51):
Half wondering if we might be able to support a fluentpath expression for the enable when, now that would be cool.
Need a fluentpath js engine though.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
