FHIR Chat · PractitionerRole extension · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: PractitionerRole extension


view this post on Zulip Rick Geimer (Feb 01 2019 at 15:32):

At the WGM I heard rumors that someone (@Grahame Grieve ?) created a global extension for FHIR STU3 that could be used anywhere Practitioner was legal but where WGs had not updated their resources to use PractitionerRole in time for STU3 publication. If true, can someone point me to it? Did not see such a thing listed in the extensibility registry: http://hl7.org/fhir/extensibility-registry.html

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 01 2019 at 19:51):

I said it could be done

view this post on Zulip Rick Geimer (Feb 01 2019 at 20:07):

Thanks Grahame, I must have mis-heard that then. Would you recommend this go in the current build as a core extension, or that it be defined in an IG such as one of the Da Vinci IGs?

view this post on Zulip Ardon Toonstra (Feb 06 2019 at 12:24):

We would be very happy with an international / core extension for this.

view this post on Zulip Vibin_chander (Feb 26 2019 at 17:41):

Trying to identify where the NPI number of the practitioner will come in Version 2 of the Practitioner GET call


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC