Stream: implementers
Topic: Practitioner Resource
Aritra Kundu (Oct 30 2019 at 11:05):
Hi Team,
I am trying to create a Bundle resource where I want to add the below fields:
Malpractice Insurance Carrier Name
Malpractice Insurance Policy Number
Malpractice Insurance Coverage limitation
Malpractice Insurance Coverage Expiry Date
Could you please let me know in which resource I can add this and link to a Practitioner?
Regards,
Aritra
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 30 2019 at 13:33):
I expect those would be extensions. I'm not aware of an ability of FHIR to carry a Practitioner's insurance. @Brian Postlethwaite ?
Brian Postlethwaite (Oct 30 2019 at 13:34):
Nothing I've seen before, any chance you've seen it @Paul Knapp?
Michele Mottini (Oct 30 2019 at 13:41):
Use Contract?
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 30 2019 at 16:06):
That seems an odd choice, but it might work.
Aritra Kundu (Oct 30 2019 at 16:58):
Hi Team,
I am trying to create a Bundle resource where I want to add the below fields:
Malpractice Insurance Carrier Name
Malpractice Insurance Policy Number
Malpractice Insurance Coverage limitation
Malpractice Insurance Coverage Expiry DateCould you please let me know in which resource I can add this and link to a Practitioner?
Regards,
Aritra
Can I use CoverageType Resource in this context? If so, how would I link this to Practitioner. It would be great if someone can reply on this.
Thanks,
Aritra
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 30 2019 at 18:34):
Coverage is aimed at healthcare coverage for Patients, not liability coverage for Practitioners
Paul Knapp (Feb 19 2020 at 16:42):
Either extensions or a profile on Contract, I think the latter would be better but it would require that we do some cleanup on Contract.
Craig Thompson (Oct 01 2020 at 18:01):
Hoping someone can help me understand patient/Practitioner scope. I'm testing the carin bluebutton consumer app (https://github.com/carin-alliance/cpcds-client-ri). This is a patient launch app that pulls down EOBs from the server and then loops through and calls for a Practitioner resource based on the data in the EOB. Our FHIR server is throwing a permissions error when the request comes through for the practitioner. The scopes in the app are currently "launch patient/Patient.read openid fhirUser". I've changed them to patient/*.read. Given the scopes, should a user be able to request a /Practitioner resource or are additional scopes necessary. Thanks, Craig
Michele Mottini (Oct 01 2020 at 18:51):
patent/*.read should be enough
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
