Stream: implementers
Topic: PlanDefinition - why not WorkflowDefinition
Jose Costa Teixeira (Oct 01 2018 at 10:29):
Hi. Just to raise this topic to see if it echoes - If we are going to use planDefinition to define things that are not plans (e.g. a workflow conformance) why not call it WorkflowDefinition or SequenceDefinition or ...?
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 01 2018 at 12:51):
SequenceDefinition would colide with the Sequence resource. PlanDefinition is often used to define order sets. I'm not sure WorkflowDefinition would be that intuitive to people. Certainly having "workflow" in the metadata for PlanDefinition would be good.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
