FHIR Chat · PartOf v Location.History · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: PartOf v Location.History


view this post on Zulip Leonie Bedford (Apr 07 2021 at 08:10):

Hi,
Trying to find the best fit for Ward Transfers in the Encounter Resource.
Currently we just hold 1 record for the full encounter in FHIR Encounter (shows latest location/Ward)
We need to capture Ward transfers data -Patient went from WardA to B to c

There seem to be 2 choices
Location - holds Location,Status,Type,Period

use PartOf to capture additional encounters that belong to the main Encounter
Encounter allows a flexible nesting of Encounters using the partOf element. For example:

A patient is admitted for two weeks - This could be modeled using a single Encounter instance, in which the start and length are given for the duration of the whole stay. The admitting doctor and the responsible doctor during the stay are specified using the Participant component.
During the encounter, the patient moves from the admitting department to the Intensive Care unit and back - Three more detailed additional Encounters can be created, one for each location in which the patient stayed. Each of these Encounters has a single location (twice the admitting department and once the Intensive Care unit) and one or more participants at that location. These Encounters may use the partOf relationship to indicate these movements occurred during the longer overarching Encounter.

Wondered which option others had chosen?
PartOf seems to give the option of capturing additional data (for example if Care provider/Specialty changed at same time) as you can utilise all the Encounter fields

Location would mean capturing the data as nested locations (arrays) - from experience arrays can be difficult to report from

Does anyone have any experience in which way they went & why?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 08 2021 at 02:30):

Using sub-encounters would make sense if the organization had distinct identifiers for each and you had a notion of discharge/admission between the sub-encounters. Organizations typically have specific policies about what constitutes an encounter and a sub-encounter. If none of those come into play, stick with a single encounter and use Encounter.location


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC