Stream: implementers
Topic: PDEX Plan Net conformance expectation for search
Aleksandr Teterin (May 22 2020 at 14:15):
Hello,
I am trying to find the conformance common expectation (SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for the search parameters of the DaVinci PDEX Plan Net IG.
E. g. for US core there is a documentation that provides the conformance common expectation for the search parameters.
The mentioned DaVinci PDEX Plan Net page doesn’t specify them. The only place where I found it is the capability statement from the https://build.fhir.org/
However, quote -“This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net/ and changes regularly”.
Where I may find the stable version of Plan Net conformance common expectations for the search parameters?
Thank you, Alex
Lloyd McKenzie (May 22 2020 at 16:09):
@Mark Scrimshire
Mark Scrimshire (May 23 2020 at 22:24):
Aleksandr Teterin said:
Hello,
I am trying to find the conformance common expectation (SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for the search parameters of the DaVinci PDEX Plan Net IG.
E. g. for US core there is a documentation that provides the conformance common expectation for the search parameters.
The mentioned DaVinci PDEX Plan Net page doesn’t specify them. The only place where I found it is the capability statement from the https://build.fhir.org/
However, quote -“This version is based on the current content of https://github.com/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net/ and changes regularly”.
Where I may find the stable version of Plan Net conformance common expectations for the search parameters?
Thank you, Alex
@Saul Kravitz Can you address this question?
Saul Kravitz (May 23 2020 at 23:22):
Very good question that was raised repeatedly at the recent connectathon. High priority action item. Will try to remember to update this thread when we have something to look at.
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Aleksandr Teterin (May 27 2020 at 21:54):
@Saul Kravitz Thank you very much for the provided details!
As a FHIR server implementer I need to understand what option I need to use as the source of true:
- The description of the search parameters of the DaVinci PDEX Plan Net IG.
- The capability statement from the https://build.fhir.org
What do you think?
Saul Kravitz (May 27 2020 at 21:57):
We are in the process of reviewing the existing search parameters, and then we will update the capability statement.
I think you can expect most of the reference search parameters to "make the cut", and most of the token/string/url search parameters.
Are there specific search parameters or capabilities (chaining, reverse chaining, location.near, other) that are a concern to you?
Yengibar Manasyan (May 29 2020 at 18:15):
Hi @Mark Scrimshire @Saul Kravitz ,
With @Aleksandr Teterin I'm trying to use Plan Net.
After investigation, we think that in the build/current version are fewer issues than in the stable one.
Can we use the build version as the source of truth and develop our solution based on that IG or we must use the stable version?
By build version, I mean this: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net.
By stable version, I mean this: http://hl7.org/fhir/us/davinci-pdex-plan-net/2020Feb.
Lee Surprenant (May 29 2020 at 19:33):
This also came up at connectathon and it was advised that the latest build is likely closer to the 1.0 than the 2020Feb version. So I think I'd go from the latest build if I were you.
Saul Kravitz (May 31 2020 at 01:27):
The CI build is converging on the version to be published.
Please look at that version, and share any feedback or questions with me. Thx
Yengibar Manasyan (Jun 01 2020 at 15:06):
@Saul Kravitz maybe you can release that version afterwords? When we can expect the next release?
Saul Kravitz (Jun 01 2020 at 15:14):
CI = continuous integration.
As changes are approved by the WG, the CI build (https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net) is modified.
It is a work in progress.
Most of the remaining work relates to value sets for MS elements that are current bound with (example) binding.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
