FHIR Chat · Modifiers on reverse chaining · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Modifiers on reverse chaining


view this post on Zulip Sean McIlvenna (Apr 16 2020 at 23:11):

Is there a way to use the :not operator with a reverse chain _has query?
For example:

Patient?_has:Condition:patient:code:not=X,Y,Z

Effectively, this would return any patients that do NOT have a condition of X, Y or Z?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 17 2020 at 00:37):

@Grahame Grieve

view this post on Zulip René Spronk (Apr 17 2020 at 08:00):

I wouldn't know why not? (pun intended - the spec does seem to allow it)

view this post on Zulip James Agnew (Apr 17 2020 at 12:18):

I don't think the spec disallows that, but I bet it's not widely supported...

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Apr 17 2020 at 12:39):

I don't think the spec says anything either way

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 17 2020 at 15:08):

Sounds like a change request to clarify would be a good idea @Sean McIlvenna :)

view this post on Zulip Armando De Chiara (Feb 15 2022 at 10:17):

Hello, are there any updates regarding the use of modifiers on reverse chaining?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 15 2022 at 15:25):

I'm not sure a change request was ever submitted. @Sean McIlvenna?

view this post on Zulip Sean McIlvenna (Feb 15 2022 at 15:29):

Nope. I never submitted a change request. While it would be nice to have, it's not a priority for me.

view this post on Zulip Sean McIlvenna (Feb 15 2022 at 15:29):

Furthermore, even if I were to submit a change request, I doubt it would be very commonly implemented, so I wouldn't see the benefit of it for quite some time...


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC