FHIR Chat · Modifer after :text · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: Modifer after :text


view this post on Zulip Alexander Zautke (May 15 2018 at 11:34):

When searching on the display name of a Coding using :text is it theoretically allowed to supply additional modifiers?
For example:

  • [base]/Observation?code:text:missing=true
  • [base]/Observation?code:text:exact=Body weight

Can someone please clarify this, because I cannot find anything in the specification that would explicitly disallow it?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (May 15 2018 at 13:53):

Can you submit a change request for us to clarify this? Personally I think it should be allowed - though you may not find it commonly supported. We might need to identify what combinations are allowed.

view this post on Zulip Christiaan Knaap (May 15 2018 at 14:00):

" Parameter names may specify a modifier as a suffix." (http://hl7.org/fhir/search.html#modifiers): That is singular wording.
I certainly never read this as multiple modifiers being acceptable.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (May 15 2018 at 14:46):

There are valid use-cases for wanting more than one.

view this post on Zulip Alexander Zautke (May 15 2018 at 18:15):

The only other use case I can think of is e.g., [base]/Observation?performer:Practitioner:missing=true, in order to separate it from [base]/Observation?performer:Patient:missing=true. I will create a ticket for it, so that it can be discussed further.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 15 2018 at 21:35):

I don't think it's allowed

view this post on Zulip Alexander Zautke (May 17 2018 at 07:04):

Filled Gforge [#17220].

view this post on Zulip Chris Grenz (Mar 22 2019 at 12:55):

I'm with @Lloyd McKenzie - this should be allowed and left to implementers to decide on support.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC