FHIR Chat · List.Code Cardinality · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: List.Code Cardinality


view this post on Zulip Matthew Springer (Jul 11 2018 at 18:55):

I noticed that List.Code was defined as 0..1 and was wondering about a case where it might be preferable to supply multiple codes. This could be used either in a situation where multiple values would help specify the lists's purpose, or, as is described in the Scope and Usage for List, in a situation where the list contains multiple types of resources. Or in those situations would it be more appropriate to just have a single value that is specific enough to describe the details of the list's purpose?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 11 2018 at 18:56):

The intention is that the code is specific enough to describe the lists purpose.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC