Stream: implementers
Topic: Jan17Connectathon US-Core Track
Brett Marquard (Nov 01 2016 at 12:48):
This is the January 2017 Connectathon US-Core Track stream for discussion. Please send along any feedback.
Grahame Grieve (Jan 14 2017 at 15:23):
is there an agreed way for a server to indicate what patients clients should test with? a spreadsheet somewhere?
Brett Marquard (Jan 14 2017 at 15:41):
We just added an excel file for folks to attest which searches they support and provide patient ids US Core Tracker
Jenni Syed (Jan 14 2017 at 15:52):
For DiagnosticReport, shouldn't the date example params be le/ge? Not a list of equals tests? IE: a range rather than an exact date?
Nagesh Bashyam (Jan 14 2017 at 16:38):
If we supported the le and ge concepts, then we should be able to narrow down to the report that the provider/App or others are looking for
I am agreeing with Jenni that it is better to support "le" and "ge"
than the "eq"
Jenni Syed (Jan 14 2017 at 19:32):
I think the MU 3 CCDS requests a date range rather than a single date as well
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:40):
May want to review the paragraphs here: http://build.fhir.org/medicationstatement-definitions.html#MedicationStatement to make sure they jive with the "active" query
Michelle (Moseman) Miller (Jan 15 2017 at 16:46):
FYI, I have a pending GF#12470 to update/fix that paragraph in MedicationStatement (the paragraph was added due to tracker GF#8010, logged against DSTU2, which had different element names, element types, and value sets than STU3 now supports).
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:47):
I think what I'm struggling with is "snapshot in time" vs. the stuff in there that discusses "never"
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:48):
So, for all orders in completed/error/past statuses - should notTaken always be 'Y' - they're not currently taking it... it may have been taken in the past
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:48):
and if it is a snapshot in time... nottaking? (taking?)
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:49):
because that taken status could change every time you take compliance...
Danielle Friend (Jan 15 2017 at 16:49):
Would it be more appropriate to have a flag of "isTaking" vs "hasNotTaken" which implies history not current compliance by the patient.
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:50):
yes, i think that's where I'm struggling now, especially that we have more statuses and are saying that med statement is the "current list"
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:54):
@Michelle (Moseman) Miller @Melva Peters I feel like we've discussed the notTaken vs notTaking naming in the past... I can't remember the discussion history
Jenni Syed (Jan 15 2017 at 16:55):
I do know we've always said this is a "snapshot in time" - so it feels wrong to try to represent the entire history of the order with that flag as it is right now
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
