FHIR Chat · How to add Danish translations to code systems in FHIR · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: How to add Danish translations to code systems in FHIR


view this post on Zulip camilla andersson (Dec 19 2019 at 09:11):

How do I add Danish terms to a value set?

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:12):

Make sure you expand from a terminology server that holds Danish language display names for the code system you use?

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:13):

This is what it looks like in Dutch:

<concept>
    <code value="PST"/>
    <display value="Postal Addres"/>
    <designation>
        <language value="nl-NL"/>
        <use>
            <system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/>
            <code value="900000000000013009"/>
            <display value="Synonym"/>
        </use>
        <value value="Postadres"/>
    </designation>
</concept>

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:13):

@Grahame Grieve and @Alexander Henket , @camilla andersson would like to contribute with some danish translations of the standardized valuesets - initially focused on some of the valuesets from STU3 (which more or less would be the same in R4). Could you guys provide some guidance to her?

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:15):

I guess an excel extract (or alike )of some of the valuesets would get her rolling - @camilla andersson please specify which ones you would like to start with

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:15):

We are in the process of the same and asked HTA/UTG for guidance. No response yet. we were thinking along the lines of CodeSystem supplements. Value Set translation is not the way to go to. You should look into CodeSystem translation and treat Value Sets as a derivative work

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:15):

right

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:16):

so rephrase - Code Systems extracts

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:18):

Back in the day when I tried it, tooling was not ready yet, but Grahame had every intention to beef up support if we were serious, so I still consider this the right method. A supplement allows for proper Danish/Dutch governance while keeping the core CodeSystem governance clean for HL7

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:20):

@Grahame Grieve any luck 'beefing' it up?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:21):

I think it works now. You can contribute Danish code system supplements to the core. UTG doesn't support them yet, I think

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:23):

I've asked Ted/HTA about how that could work. Am I correct in thinking UTG would be the best starting point for these supplements?

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:23):

what is UTG/HTA?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:24):

it depends what you want to supplement. If the code systems are FHIR bound code systems, then you need to do it in the FHIR core. If the code systems are in UTG, you need to do it in there

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:24):

Even though adding it to the core could certainly be a way too? The use case for us is V3 in a European ehDSI setting. FHIR is mainly the technology there.

UTG = HL7 Terminology Governance Process

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:25):

HTA = HL7 Health Terminology Authority

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:25):

I'm pretty sure that the CodeSystems that @camilla andersson would like to provide translations for are within the FHIR Core

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:25):

we are not changing terminology here - we are 'just' providing translations

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:25):

v3 = UTG

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:25):

@Jens Villadsen which code systems?

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:26):

@camilla andersson which code systems?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:26):

ping...pong...

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:27):

If we supply the supplements containing translations to UTG, would that trickle down into FHIR itself? That was my assumption

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:28):

It concerns a number of V3 CodeSystems, also listed in the FHIR spec (AdministrativeGender, MaritalStatus, NullFlavor, and then some)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:29):

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'trickle down into FHIR itself'

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:29):

Once UTG is published, those parts of FHIR will become references into UTG in future versions

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:32):

I think that answers the question with Yes. Trickle down means that the CodeSystems as they live in the FHIR publications would contain supplements too. Comparable to Dutch being rendered today actually here: http://build.fhir.org/v3/AdministrativeGender/cs.html

view this post on Zulip Alexander Henket (Dec 19 2019 at 09:33):

And probably inclusion in tx.fhir.org so you could base ValueSet expansions on them

view this post on Zulip camilla andersson (Dec 19 2019 at 09:47):

@Jens Villadsen It could be the code system for priority in http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/procedurerequest.html. The FUT project could potentially have a lot more codesystems for translations.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:48):

there's a 3rd altenative that you could consider: just publish your own package that contains the code system supplements, and anyone who wants them can pick them up in an IG or an implementation (including a terminology server)

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:49):

The code system would then be http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/codesystem-request-priority.html

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:50):

that's the page, not the canonical url

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:51):

correct - @Grahame Grieve I guess the intention here is that @camilla andersson would like to add contributions to the FHIR spec (given that the FHIR standard is capable of receiving such input - which it should be IMHO)

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:51):

and the thing is there that the contributions consists of a translation which does not alter the meaning of the spec

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 09:59):

well, you can't add to STU3

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 09:59):

tell that to 3.0.2 ;)

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 10:00):

i get that it is not a technical correction ... so the translations should probably be added to latest, if accepted

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 10:16):

yes

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 10:16):

gr8t

view this post on Zulip Jens Villadsen (Dec 19 2019 at 10:18):

@camilla andersson If you have a look at http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/codesystem-request-priority.html, and provide the proper danish translations in eg. a spreadsheet, I'll do what I can to get it into the spec


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC