FHIR Chat · GF#17015 - Backbone Specializations · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: GF#17015 - Backbone Specializations


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 13 2018 at 02:55):

GF#17015 askes why we both publishing this list: http://hl7.org/fhir/2018May/backboneelement.html#summary

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 13 2018 at 02:56):

The answer is, because @Brian Postlethwaite asked us to.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 13 2018 at 02:56):

in a previous ballot.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 13 2018 at 02:56):

though I think it's a very technical artifact that we could publish somewhere else.... does anyone have any opinions on this?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 13 2018 at 02:57):

"we both" = "we bother"?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 13 2018 at 02:59):

y

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Jun 25 2018 at 07:54):

This is used in the code generator to explicitly define the classname that is generated (where there are some really long ones, or the names clash when auto-generating)

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Jun 25 2018 at 07:54):

And was a great location to be able to see all these names.
(I believe that the JAVA generator also uses the values)

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 25 2018 at 09:18):

Does it need to be rendered for readers of the spec?

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Jun 25 2018 at 09:21):

Can be a handy reference for those doing code generations. (doen't have to be normative though)

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jun 25 2018 at 09:30):

I'm fine with producing it - just lean towards a link to a file rather than putting that noise in the rendered spec

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jun 25 2018 at 10:28):

I can make it a .... text... file?

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Jun 25 2018 at 10:58):

with html as the content?
(just don't link to it from anything)
:tongue:


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC