Stream: implementers
Topic: FhirResources
HarshaVardan (Aug 28 2018 at 12:43):
hi all ,anyone heard the following terms..
these are fhirResouce related terms if anyone know letme know...
Emergency_Services;
Meets_criteria_for_meaningful_use_of_EHRs;
Hospital_overall_rating;
Hospital_overall_rating_footnote;
Mortality_national_comparison;
Mortality_national_comparison_footnote;
Safety_of_care_national_comparison;
Safety_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Readmission_national_comparison;
Readmission_national_comparison_footnote;
Patient_experience_national_comparison;
Patient_experience_national_comparison_footnote;
Effectiveness_of_care_national_comparison;
Effectiveness_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Timeliness_of_care_national_comparison;
Timeliness_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Efficient_use_of_medical_imaging_national_comparison;
Efficient_use_of_medical_imaging_national_comparison_footnote;
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 28 2018 at 15:20):
I'm not really understanding the question. Are you asking where these notions would be represented in FHIR? Where are you getting the terms from and how are they being used? That will influence how you want to represent them.
HarshaVardan (Aug 29 2018 at 06:33):
@Lloyd McKenzie thakyou for responding..
yes,am asking where these notations are used in fhir??
i've exaplained one example can easily understand my question.
The following terms are we can frequently used in fhir
codesystems,
valuesets and
phonenumbers are terms,
codesystem and valuesets are one type of resources ,phonenumber is may hospital phonenumber or patient phonenumber or
practitioner phonenumber.
like this anybody heard these following terms??
Emergency_Services;
Meets_criteria_for_meaningful_use_of_EHRs;
Hospital_overall_rating;
Hospital_overall_rating_footnote;
Mortality_national_comparison;
Mortality_national_comparison_footnote;
Safety_of_care_national_comparison;
Safety_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Readmission_national_comparison;
Readmission_national_comparison_footnote;
Patient_experience_national_comparison;
Patient_experience_national_comparison_footnote;
Effectiveness_of_care_national_comparison;
Effectiveness_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Timeliness_of_care_national_comparison;
Timeliness_of_care_national_comparison_footnote;
Efficient_use_of_medical_imaging_national_comparison;
Efficient_use_of_medical_imaging_national_comparison_footnote;
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 29 2018 at 06:48):
Most of them sound like Observations being made about Organizations, but we'd need definitions of the terms to be sure. The only exception might be Emergency_Services - I'm not sure what that one means
HarshaVardan (Aug 31 2018 at 07:53):
Hi all,Fhir have a Resource Structure ,can I change that resource Structure as per my Requirement.
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 31 2018 at 15:40):
@HarshaVardan - No. You can't make changes to any FHIR resources or data types if you want to be conformant. If you need additional data elements, you can use the extension mechanism.
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 31 2018 at 15:40):
You can constrain - tightening cardinalities, reducing allowed data types.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Sep 06 2018 at 18:34):
Most of them sound like Observations being made about Organizations, but we'd need definitions of the terms to be sure.
@Lloyd McKenzie These seem quality indicators, so measure or measureReport would be a better fit, right?
Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 06 2018 at 18:35):
Those are certainly other candidates. Again, we'd need definitions to know for sure.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Sep 06 2018 at 18:37):
sure, just the name seemed quite familiar to some metrics i have worked before
HarshaVardan (Sep 17 2018 at 13:48):
Hi ,How to do Custom-validate to
Resource?
Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 17 2018 at 14:55):
Are you asking how to use the Java validator? You can find it here: http://build.fhir.org/validator.zip. If you run the jar, it'll provide instructions for how to invoke it from the commandline.
Grahame Grieve (Sep 18 2018 at 11:17):
or see http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Using_the_FHIR_Validator
HarshaVardan (Sep 26 2018 at 07:00):
Hi all, we have created our profiles based on fhir and defined our validators to that profiles. But how to handle other profiles which have their own validations at server side?
Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 26 2018 at 16:04):
You can choose to validate other profiles, perhaps trying to retrieve them from their canonical URL or from known registries. And you can reject instances that declare a profile but don't validate against the declared profile. However, there's no requirement to validate against unrecognized profiles. Profiles never change the meaning of an instance so they can always be safely ignored.
HarshaVardan (Sep 27 2018 at 08:56):
(deleted)
HarshaVardan (Sep 27 2018 at 09:02):
You can choose to validate other profiles, perhaps trying to retrieve them from their canonical URL or from known registries. And you can reject instances that declare a profile but don't validate against the declared profile. However, there's no requirement to validate against unrecognized profiles. Profiles never change the meaning of an instance so they can always be safely ignored.
Hi @Lloyd McKenzie thankyou for your response
There is no need to validate other profiles but I put a customValidator for sake of my profiles.But whenever retriving other profiles through their registry until unless that resources also validate i think.
my intension is for my resource it should be validate but for other resource it should not be validate.
is it possible to solve this problem??
Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 27 2018 at 15:03):
If you have a custom validator, it should be possible to solve pretty much any problem - if you write the right code :) I'm not clear on what issue you're asking the community to help with.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
