FHIR Chat · FHIR version support · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: FHIR version support


view this post on Zulip Radha Rajendran (Mar 15 2021 at 06:37):

Hi all,

Does anyone know how to support all version of resources in FHIR receiver ?

Is FHIR schema.json will validate all resources version ?
Do we need any mapping to support old version data structure ?

Thanks in advance

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 10:42):

@Radha Rajendran , perhaps https://www.hl7.org/fhir/capabilitystatement.html#mixed will help (if i understood the question)

view this post on Zulip Radha Rajendran (Mar 15 2021 at 11:54):

Okay . If i want to support multiple fhir version do i need to support using profile ?

view this post on Zulip Rik Smithies (Mar 15 2021 at 12:17):

There is no direct relationship between multiple FHIR versions and profiles. Profiles are an implementation and specification technique, but are always optional in FHIR - unless that is you are working under a framework that mandates them.

view this post on Zulip Radha Rajendran (Mar 15 2021 at 12:28):

okay thank you

view this post on Zulip Radha Rajendran (Mar 15 2021 at 12:28):

Any suggestions, How to support multiple fhir version ?

view this post on Zulip Rik Smithies (Mar 15 2021 at 13:23):

http://hl7.org/fhir/versioning.html

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Mar 15 2021 at 13:33):

Different FHIR version are not compatible with each other, so you have to write different client code for each version

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 15 2021 at 14:21):

Alternatively, have a layer in your code that transforms received and outbound instances from and to a standard version you use internally

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 15 2021 at 14:21):

The FHIR spec provides some basic transforms, but you'd have to adjust to account for any extensions you use and possibly other variations

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:22):

but the protocol doesn't dictate that the HTTP payload version be identified, does it?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 15 2021 at 14:23):

The CapabilityStatement available at [base]/metadata will declare the version if the Content-Type does not

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:24):

ahh, but the Content-Type can identify the version then

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:25):

so if you have one endpoint supporting n versions, all PUT, POSTS and PATCHES MUST have C-Ts that identify the version?

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:27):

(or maybe you can have a system-specific default but transactions of all other versions must id themselves)

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:28):

and i guess that implies that for GETs, the Accept could allow the client to request a version, which could be practical if you transcode (where possible) on the fly

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (Mar 15 2021 at 14:29):

sorry, this is probably all implied by http://hl7.org/fhir/versioning.html#mt-version

view this post on Zulip Radha Rajendran (Mar 15 2021 at 14:30):

Thank you all


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC