Stream: implementers
Topic: FHIR Mapping to Custom Applications
Lokesh G S (Oct 26 2020 at 07:21):
Hi Team, can you guys help us with the fhir mapping with the custom applications?
René Spronk (Oct 26 2020 at 07:38):
Could your provide more details? Please also see https://wiki.hl7.org/FHIR_Rules_for_asking_questions
Lokesh G S (Oct 26 2020 at 07:51):
I shall upload the file with our fields which are used for the practitioner & organization .. can you please help us with mapping
Lokesh G S (Oct 26 2020 at 07:51):
René Spronk (Oct 26 2020 at 12:43):
As pointed out in the above 'rules for asking questions' - we (all of us are volunteers) are not going to do your work for you - we'll answer your questions should you run into problems mapping specific fields.
I would suggest you start by reading the documentation of the Practitioner and the Organization resource, and then to document the mapping in your spreadsheet.
Jean Duteau (Oct 28 2020 at 06:00):
@Lokesh G S Most of your fields can be found in the Practitioner and Organization resources. I suggest you look at those two resources in FHIR specification and do your mapping to those.
Clinicial/Practitioner
Biodata - name, identifier, gender, photo - all found in Practitioner
Credentials - could be Qualifications
Relationship to Organization is done via PractitionerRole
Many of the other Practitioner stuff would be Observations or Extensions
Organization
Name, Addresses, Phone, Type, Identifier, Contact - all found in Organization
Departments - partOf reference to Organization
Rest would be Observations or Extensions again
Lokesh G S (Oct 28 2020 at 06:30):
hi @Jean Duteau thanks i will check it . can you please tell us
-
Video Introduction details?
-
Patient reviews on practitioner?
-
Star Rating given to the practitioner by patient?
-
Digital certificates?
-
Practitioner tagging like (Signposting, Charity, Crisis, Referring Clinician, Cross-referral, etc. )
Jean Duteau (Oct 28 2020 at 06:31):
I'll let you see if you can figure out if those are available on the Practitioner or not. :) (see Lloyd's answers in your other thread you started)
claudia (Apr 29 2021 at 04:54):
hello, is there anyone familiar with FHIR Mapping language ? I have several platform would be mapped to FHIR, the problem is that each platform has its own naming field, i.e.: Platform A has FirstName and platform B has first_name. I'm thinking if we could automatically detect that and convert it to FHIR standard that'll be better than creating 2 converters to specifically convert those
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 29 2021 at 05:23):
Building an external interface that is consistent will certainly make it easier for external partners to interoperate with your systems. You'd still be looking at maintaining a distinct StructureMap for each platform to deal with the distinctions, though you may be able to share some pieces of it if there are consistencies across the platforms.
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 29 2021 at 05:23):
Most of the mapping folks hang out on #mapping-framework
Eric Prud'hommeaux (Apr 29 2021 at 05:29):
"automatically detect that and convert it" implies (to my ears) using some heuristics like flattening cases and removing '_'s to compile a set of maps. Is that what you had in mind? (and maybe i should have asked you in #mapping-framework)
claudia (Apr 30 2021 at 00:17):
@Eric Prud'hommeaux , yep that's what I am referring to
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
