Stream: implementers
Topic: Containment rules of thumb
Ken Sinn (Jul 07 2016 at 21:44):
I've had a look at the blog posting at https://fhirblog.com/2013/10/10/fhir-contained-resources/
Let's say I'm exposing a MedicationOrder resource, but I don't want to expose the referenced Patient Resource. Would that drive my implementation to use a Contained Patient resource within MedicationOrder, or is it irrelevant? That is, if I used a relative/absolute reference to a Patient Resource within MedicationOrder, does it necessarily mean that the Patient resource is now exposed and accessible? (or is it irrelevant and can be implemented by security?)
David Hay (Jul 07 2016 at 21:52):
Whoa! my very first post! Do note that the actual formats have changed from DSTU1... see http://hl7.org/fhir/references.html
John Moehrke (Jul 07 2016 at 22:55):
@David Hay Blogs are so much fun to own... Still today one of my most popular (4th overall) is one I wrote in October 2010 on how to beat the Meaningful Use (1) encryption requirement. I have even replaced the header to explain that it is out-dated...
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
