Stream: implementers
Topic: Consent bundling
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 12:00):
How would we express bundle of consents?
Example:
I consent to
- donating
- my liver
- my heart
- my corneas
- for
- transplant
- but not for
- research
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 12:02):
Composition would be a first thought. Any others?
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 12:25):
each of these would be .provisions in a single Consent. Yes each concept could be their own Consent... we allow either model. Putting that into a Composition could certainly be done, just like anything can be composed.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 12:34):
Consent.provision is 0..1 ...
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 12:57):
Consent.provision.provision is 0..* That is the repetition. The root .povision sets context for the whole consent. The .provision.provision(s) set the conditions within. And each .provision.provision can have .provisions. SO in your example you would have a tree of provisions for each topic
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 13:01):
ok i missed that, thanks
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 13:03):
so consent.provision can be our grouping element. that should work
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:04):
so you would have a root .provision indicating this is a consent to donate. Then you would have three .provision.provision, one for each body part with an indication of positive donation for action of transplant. Then each of these three would have another .provision.provision.provision with a DENY action for action of research
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:05):
not sure how you indicate the bodypart, I guess by .code?
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:06):
would be great to get an example like this into the spec. First all the examples are privacy (because that is the group expertise), and none of them go deeper than 2 levels.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Mar 18 2020 at 13:07):
We're working on patient will. Let me see if we have a rich example
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:08):
a few simple examples are always useful. rich example is good, but not a good way to introduce someone to a resource use
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:10):
hmm, there is no Consent.scope or Consent.category for donation type consent. Those would need to be added to the extensible
John Moehrke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:12):
the lack of section 6.2.1.2+ indication that nothing beyond privacy has been considered
David Pyke (Mar 18 2020 at 13:19):
It's been considered but we have no formal guidance at this point. Volunteers to help us address that are welcome
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
