Stream: implementers
Topic: Consent based on dynamic/computed data membership
Anand Mohan Tumuluri (Jul 25 2018 at 00:26):
We are planning to use FHIR Consent as the vehicle for our person to institution/person sharing of data. (We cant do HEART/UMA yet due to some limitations from our Authorization Server). In this regard, I would like to ask if Consent can be extended to support dynamic data definitions rather than just static references to currently existing resources. For example, Patient Alice wants to share any current and future Observations with a specific code and a certain security label to his psychiatrist only and say current and future Vital Signs observations to his PCP.
Something like Group.characteristic can be used to compute the dynamic group membership.
Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2018 at 00:28):
that would be Consent.provision.code and Consent.provision.securityLabel
Anand Mohan Tumuluri (Jul 25 2018 at 00:34):
Thanks a lot for your response.
I am aware of Consent.provision.securityLabel but didn't understand the meaning of Consent.provision.code till now. So the code here can apply to Observation.code and Condition.code? Is there any other generic meaning for this code?
Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2018 at 00:35):
medication.code...
Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2018 at 00:35):
or cda code
Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2018 at 00:35):
we haven't specified the link at all tightly
Anand Mohan Tumuluri (Jul 25 2018 at 00:38):
Thank you very much. That covers our general use case quite well
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
