Stream: implementers
Topic: Condition.asserted to diagnosis.prevelance
Joseph Sadlon (Jan 17 2019 at 20:12):
If a Condition FHIR resource has an asserted date but does not have an onset or abatement date, is it recommended to map condition.asserted to the Onset date and abatement date of a Diagnosis QDM prevalence period?
@Bryn Rhodes
Bryn Rhodes (Jan 17 2019 at 20:19):
The latest mapping for QDM-QI-Core is: http://build.fhir.org/ig/cqframework/qi-core/ConditionDiagnosisProblem.html
Bryn Rhodes (Jan 17 2019 at 20:20):
Based on that mapping, so long as the condition status is active, yes, you could use onset or asserted for the start of the prevalence period in a QDM Diagnosis.
Joseph Sadlon (Jan 17 2019 at 20:48):
Thanks @Bryn Rhodes . However, in the scenario I am evaluated, a provider documents a diagnosis without entering an onset or end time. Therefore, in the condition FHIR resource, there is only an asserted date, onset and abatement are not populated. In this scenario, is it recommended, or do other implementers, populate this condition.asserteddate as the diagnosis abatement date in QDM?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
