Stream: implementers
Topic: Concept Map $translate
Jane Pankratova (Aug 10 2021 at 17:04):
Hi everyone!
I am currently implementing the POST-$translate method for a ConceptMap resource.
I ran into a problem that in the current version of FHIR R4 only coding can be passed to the dependency.concept parameter.
In one of the discussions here, I found out that in R5 it is proposed to replace dependency.concept with dependency.value, where it would be possible to write not only CodeableConcept, but all other types as well.
The problem is that it's not enough for me to pass only the value, for example:
{
"resourceType": "Parameters",
"parameter": [
{
"name": "code",
"valueCode": "10001005"
},
{
"name": "dependency",
"part": [
{
"name": "value",
"valueQuantity": {
"value": 1,
"unit": "year",
"system": "http://unitsofmeasure.org",
"code": "a"
}
}
]
}
]
}
But I need to identify it with concept. So it's not just some value, but it's the value within a code system, for example:
{
"resourceType": "Parameters",
"parameter": [
{
"name": "code",
"valueCode": "10001005"
},
{
"name": "dependency",
"part": [
{
"name": "value",
"valueQuantity": {
"value": 1,
"unit": "year",
"system": "http://unitsofmeasure.org",
"code": "a"
}
},
{
"name": "concept",
"valueCoding": {
"system": "http://smomed.info/sct",
"code": "445518008"
}
}
]
}
]
}
Is it okay to do something like that?
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 10 2021 at 17:30):
You might be best off raising this in the #terminology stream
Jane Pankratova (Aug 10 2021 at 17:45):
okay, thanks!
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
