FHIR Chat · CareTeam.status · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: CareTeam.status


view this post on Zulip Mustafa Yuksel (Jan 04 2017 at 15:19):

Is there a specific reason why CareTeam.status is not of type codebut CodeableConcept, unlike many other similar resources? Is it because there is not yet a (required) CareTeamStatus value set in place, although there are some suggested codes?

view this post on Zulip Michelle (Moseman) Miller (Jan 04 2017 at 15:40):

Once Patient Care WG finishes up QA on this resource, the data type could indeed change from CodeableConcept to code. First, we need a discussion on what the status value set should be and whether it's required binding. I had previously logged GF#10725 as a ballot comment to address the missing value sets within this resource, so it's on our radar to resolve before STU3.

view this post on Zulip Mustafa Yuksel (Jan 05 2017 at 06:08):

Thank you so much for the explanation @Michelle (Moseman) Miller . It would be very good to have these in STU3.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC