Stream: implementers
Topic: CarePlan.activity.detail.location
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 14:46):
CarePlan.activity.detail.location is a Reference(Location).
In some cases this is too much. We just have to say "do it at home".
@Michelle (Moseman) Miller can this be a CodeableReference?
Michele Mottini (Jan 17 2020 at 14:58):
Use Reference.display
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 14:59):
How? With an embedded Location?
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 14:59):
that is what I'd simplify
Michele Mottini (Jan 17 2020 at 15:01):
No embedded location - just populate only the display element of the Location reference (that is a pretty common thing to do)
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 15:02):
ah ok. sorry, you are right.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 15:02):
I'd still prefer CodeableReference.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 15:03):
things like "at home", "at work" are good candidates for master data
Michele Mottini (Jan 17 2020 at 15:04):
Yes - it just requires adding that to the spec and then switching to a new version of FHIR
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 15:06):
My goal is indeed to get feedback on that change before creating a Jira ticket
Michele Mottini (Jan 17 2020 at 15:11):
My feedback would be not to change it - there is an OK way to solve that problem with the current specs
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 15:26):
If location "home" is a code...?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 17 2020 at 16:00):
Having it coded allows for a constrained vocabulary of location types. This would be a place where CodeableReference could make sense. A change request is probably reasonable.
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 17 2020 at 20:29):
Michelle (Moseman) Miller (Jan 21 2020 at 21:38):
Thanks for logging the change request, but I think there is a typo above -- in case anyone else wants to "watch" the JIRA, it is logged as J#25526
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 21 2020 at 21:49):
Thanks Michelle.
Yes, J#25526
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
