Stream: implementers
Topic: CarePlan definition
Dave Carlson (Jan 24 2017 at 01:04):
@Bryn Rhodes while looking at current build of CarePlan, the elements CarePlan.definition and CarePlan.activity.detail.definition both refer to a PlanDefinition. I would have expected the detail.definition to reference an ActivityDefinition. Is this an error in the current build?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 24 2017 at 02:45):
I would expect activity.detail.definition could point to either. It's possible one care plan could point to a "smaller" care plan as a sub-activity, but it would certainly be appropriate for it to point to ActivityDefinition too
Bryn Rhodes (Jan 24 2017 at 03:26):
Yes, I would expect that to be able to point to an ActivityDefinition, though it could point to a PlanDefinition as well.
Dave Carlson (Jan 24 2017 at 17:00):
Thanks Lloyd and Bryn, don't know if we can get this change into STU3, but will give it a try.
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 24 2017 at 21:09):
I think it's a simple technical correction stemming from the refactoring of Protocol into PlanDefinition - not sure it even requires a vote. @Michelle (Moseman) Miller opinion?
Michelle (Moseman) Miller (Jan 25 2017 at 14:37):
I'll proceed with auto-approving it as a correction and hopefully commit the change today.
Dave Carlson (Jan 25 2017 at 18:20):
Thanks Michelle!
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
