Stream: implementers
Topic: CapabilityStatement vs ImplementationGuide tooling support
Vadim Peretokin (Mar 30 2017 at 13:24):
Is anyone using CapabilityStatement or ImplentationGuide resources with any machine readability? For example autogenerating tooling support, importing requires profiles they need to support, or anything else? Looking to pick whenever to publish the ImplementationGuide (MTT 0 and designed for the HL7 publisher only really) vs CapabilityStatement (MTT2) with kind=requirements
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 30 2017 at 18:57):
The ImplementationGuide is about packaging and rendering a collection of artifacts. CapabilityStatement is about defining what systems are capable of doing. ImplementationGuides can be useful for validation tooling as they package all of the related validation artifacts together. However, for most things, driving off CapabilityStatement is probably more useful.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
