FHIR Chat · CapabilityStatement format · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: CapabilityStatement format


view this post on Zulip Jenni Syed (Mar 26 2019 at 18:44):

Is this a legal binding: http://hl7.org/fhir/r4/capabilitystatement-definitions.html#CapabilityStatement.format

view this post on Zulip Jenni Syed (Mar 26 2019 at 18:45):

It states it's required to the mime types, but also allows "xml" "json" and "ttl" - which aren't part of the required value set?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 26 2019 at 18:45):

Nope, that looks broken. Can you submit a change request?

view this post on Zulip Jenni Syed (Mar 26 2019 at 18:46):

And then... does that mean you can't declare application/json+fhir? :)

view this post on Zulip Jenni Syed (Mar 26 2019 at 18:46):

(and yes, I'll get one out)

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 26 2019 at 18:48):

I suspect that the resolution will be to change the comment to list the full proper mime types for the syntaxes, but I don't know for sure. Certainly the proper mime types appear to be legal against the spec, so that should be safe to do.

view this post on Zulip Jenni Syed (Mar 26 2019 at 18:54):

GF#20617


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC