Stream: implementers
Topic: Cannonical JSON for signature
nicola (RIO/SS) (Nov 28 2016 at 14:17):
Here is RFC for json canonical representation for signature - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-staykov-hu-json-canonical-form-00. May be will be helpful.
John Moehrke (Nov 28 2016 at 14:58):
It is true that JSON signatures are a specific core issue. One that will eventually be standardized. The larger problem we have in FHIR is our principle that the server can convert as needed between the various encodings. See http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Digital_Signature_Working_Page
Grahame Grieve (Nov 28 2016 at 18:46):
have both of you read http://build.fhir.org/json.html#canonical and http://build.fhir.org/xml.html#digsig? All these canonicalisations are robust against format transform
Grahame Grieve (Nov 28 2016 at 18:47):
@nicola (RIO) if you can watch that and let us know if it progress beyond a draft, and I'll reference that in the json part of the spec since it's exactly the same except for doubles (an issue I overlooked)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
