Stream: implementers
Topic: Ballot questions
Grahame Grieve (Dec 18 2017 at 09:24):
From Ewout: Two questions:
- I don't see any normative markers on the mentioned link http://build.fhir.org/terminologies-systems.html, is that correct?
- The status markers like those on Bundle.signature allow marking parts of normative conent as "trial use", is that the intent? So there will be a "super normative" when all parts of a normative resource are normative? Or will there always be non-normative parts in normative resources?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 18 2017 at 09:24):
yes there are normative markers on the Internal (FHIR) tab
Grahame Grieve (Dec 18 2017 at 09:24):
yes, some parts of a resource can marked as non-normative. On the FHIR-I call we need to discuss whether we're going to do it
Richard Kavanagh (May 07 2018 at 16:40):
Two questions
Is the definition of "backwards compatibility" defined anywhere from FHIR - what can change when something is normative?
do the standard extensions become normative? If so when?
thanks
Reinhard Egelkraut (May 07 2018 at 17:01):
concerning backwards compatibility there is the following description:
http://build.fhir.org/versions.html#b-compat
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
