Stream: committers
Topic: freeze question
Grahame Grieve (Mar 22 2016 at 05:37):
all - please let me know if there's any tasks you would like me to get done before the freeze next week
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 22 2016 at 16:12):
In the MeasureReport resource, several of the elements are defined as Reference(Bundle), but I would like them to be Reference(List), I want them to be references to the resources, not contain the resources. But when I try to set them to Reference(List), I get an error about not being able to find the class "List_" in the java compilation. It's not critical, but it would be a nice-to-have.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 22 2016 at 18:52):
that's bizarre
Grahame Grieve (Mar 22 2016 at 19:16):
and now fixed, @Bryn Rhodes
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 22 2016 at 22:54):
Yep, that took care of it, thanks @Grahame Grieve
Grahame Grieve (Mar 22 2016 at 22:59):
np
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 21:53):
Not sure if this is a freeze question, necessarily, but within the valueset definition here: https://hl7-fhir.github.io/valueset-action-behavior-type, I'd like to be able to have the definitions of the codes link to another valueset.
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 21:53):
For example, the "grouping" code should link to: https://hl7-fhir.github.io/valueset-action-grouping-behavior
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 21:54):
Can I put the link in the description of the value set in the resource sheet?
Grahame Grieve (Mar 24 2016 at 23:04):
I don't understand this Question. Are you trying to use codes? It looks like you've Set it up wrong?
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:06):
Well, I have different possible values for behaviors, depending on the type of the behavior. So for each type of behavior, there is a different set of applicable possible values.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 24 2016 at 23:10):
What type of behaviour? Defined by some other element, or by the use case?
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:13):
By the use case. I need to be able to specify different types of behaviors on each action. For example, selection behavior. And if I'm specifying the selection-behavior for an action, I have a specific set of possible values.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 24 2016 at 23:15):
What's the "action"- implicit or explicit?
Rob Hausam (Mar 24 2016 at 23:17):
That sounds like a conditional (and/or nested) value set binding to me - as far as I know, we haven't so far considered doing that?
Grahame Grieve (Mar 24 2016 at 23:20):
If it's explicit, you can bind to the full value set that includes all the codes, and then do invariants that specify tighter bindings based of another element value. If it's implicit, you have to write the equivalent statements in narrative
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:23):
It is explicit, so using invariants would work to enforce, but not necessarily to document it.
Rob Hausam (Mar 24 2016 at 23:26):
that makes sense
does the full value set exist at the moment? - it didn't appear so from my brief perusal
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:45):
No, not currently, there's an individual valueset for each.
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:45):
I could combine them into one code system, then define a value set for each subset of behavior.
Bryn Rhodes (Mar 24 2016 at 23:46):
But I would still want to put the link to each valueset in the descriptions of the behavior-type codes. :)
Grahame Grieve (Mar 25 2016 at 01:36):
It looks like it could if Bryn defined it. As for document, you always have narrative. Or you could restructure to make the bindings different, but I figure that would be a net loss. Could be a big net loss
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
