FHIR Chat · administrative gender mapping issue · committers

Stream: committers

Topic: administrative gender mapping issue


view this post on Zulip Drew Torres (Aug 08 2018 at 22:20):

I was reviewing http://build.fhir.org/valueset-administrative-gender.html and noticed the duplication of the mappings for v2 and v3. I am curious where those are grabbed from?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2018 at 22:21):

the duplication in the rendering is on my task list. the mappings are done in the spreadsheet

view this post on Zulip Drew Torres (Aug 08 2018 at 22:23):

Is it the binding.xml?

view this post on Zulip Drew Torres (Aug 08 2018 at 22:26):

The reason I ask is because I suspected bindings.xml because it has administrative gender listed, but only the first map is returned.
The gender of a person could not be uniquely defined as male or female, such as hermaphrodite. <AdministrativeGender.UN >0001.A,>0001.O
The render shows only a mapping of Other to ambiguous when it should also map to other as well.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2018 at 22:38):

maybe bindings yes. I don't think you can do 2 bindings that way - make a task for me to investigate

view this post on Zulip Drew Torres (Aug 08 2018 at 22:43):

There is an existing one that can probably be kicked over to you: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=16189

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2018 at 22:55):

ok

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 12:12):

@Grahame Grieve , this was indicated that it was a tooling issue, I think this has been resolved, is that correct?
(then I can close the issue)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 10 2018 at 12:33):

oh hang on

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 10 2018 at 12:33):

is it rendering right?

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 12:34):

I think so, but wasn't 100% sure if I was looking in the right place and nothing had been done.

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 12:34):

I'll recheck.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 10 2018 at 12:35):

well, I did look at a task that said the mappings were missing. They weren't, so wrote it off. but if it meant a particular mapping... I missed that

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 12:37):

Yup, just compared to the May ballot build, and the duplication that was there is now gone.

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 10 2018 at 12:37):

I'll close the issue as complete - thanks.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 10 2018 at 12:37):

ok great


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC